CRAN Package Check Results for Package noncompliance

Last updated on 2020-09-19 05:49:35 CEST.

Flavor Version Tinstall Tcheck Ttotal Status Flags
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang 0.2.2 24.84 52.08 76.92 OK
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc 0.2.2 17.14 38.57 55.71 OK
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang 0.2.2 101.85 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc 0.2.2 90.94 NOTE
r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64 0.2.2 52.00 124.00 176.00 OK
r-patched-linux-x86_64 0.2.2 18.31 49.76 68.07 OK
r-patched-solaris-x86 0.2.2 119.50 OK
r-release-linux-x86_64 0.2.2 18.51 49.71 68.22 OK
r-release-macos-x86_64 0.2.2 OK
r-release-windows-ix86+x86_64 0.2.2 53.00 123.00 176.00 OK
r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 0.2.2 OK
r-oldrel-windows-ix86+x86_64 0.2.2 37.00 124.00 161.00 OK

Check Details

Version: 0.2.2
Check: compiled code
Result: NOTE
    File ‘noncompliance/libs/noncompliance.so’:
     Found no calls to: ‘R_registerRoutines’, ‘R_useDynamicSymbols’
    
    It is good practice to register native routines and to disable symbol
    search.
    
    See ‘Writing portable packages’ in the ‘Writing R Extensions’ manual.
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc